llmstory
8th Grade ELA Mid-Term Exam
1.

Which of the following best defines 'ethos' in rhetoric?

Select one option
2.

In rhetoric, 'pathos' refers to an appeal primarily to the audience's:

Select one option
3.

What is the primary function of 'logos' in a persuasive argument?

Select one option
4.

Which of the following sentences is an example of a metaphor?

Select one option
5.

Identify the sentence that contains a simile.

Select one option
6.

Which sentence demonstrates the rhetorical device of parallelism?

Select one option
7.

What is an 'ad hominem' fallacy?

Select one option
8.

A 'red herring' is a logical fallacy where someone:

Select one option
9.

Which statement best describes the 'straw man' fallacy?

Select one option
10.

The 'slippery slope' fallacy is characterized by:

Select one option
11.

What were common themes in the writings of early American Puritan authors?

Select one option
12.

Jonathan Edwards's sermon 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' primarily aimed:

Select one option
13.

Anne Bradstreet's poetry often explored themes of:

Select one option
14.

The primary purpose of many Revolutionary era writers (e.g., Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry) was:

Select one option
15.

In his 'Speech to the Virginia Convention,' Patrick Henry's famous line 'Give me liberty or give me death!' serves primarily:

Select one option
16.

How can you best identify the main idea of a non-fiction text?

Select one option
17.

The three common purposes an author might have for writing a non-fiction text are:

Select one option
18.

In non-fiction analysis, 'bias' refers to:

Select one option
19.

Which of the following are common types of evidence used in non-fiction texts to support claims?

Select one option
20.

What is a rhetorical question?

Select one option
Excerpt from Patrick Henry's "Speech to the Virginia Convention" (1775)

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves, and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled, that force must be resorted to to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves longer. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free—if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending—if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us! They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until we are bound hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable—and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come! It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace—but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

21.

What is Patrick Henry's main purpose in delivering this speech?

22.

Identify and explain one rhetorical appeal (ethos, pathos, or logos) that Patrick Henry uses in this excerpt. Provide textual evidence to support your answer.

23.

Identify and explain one rhetorical device (e.g., rhetorical question, allusion, parallelism) that Patrick Henry uses effectively in this passage. Provide textual evidence.

24.

How does Henry use the contrasting ideas of fear and hope to persuade his audience?

The Plastic Tide: A Call for Conscious Consumption

The ubiquitous presence of plastic in our daily lives has become a convenience we can no longer afford. From the moment we wake up to the food we eat and the products we consume, single-use plastics dominate, creating a crisis of unprecedented scale for our planet. Millions of tons of plastic waste enter our oceans annually, forming vast gyres that threaten marine ecosystems and the delicate balance of life beneath the waves.

This isn't merely an aesthetic problem; it's an ecological catastrophe. Marine animals, from majestic whales to microscopic plankton, ingest plastic fragments, leading to internal injuries, starvation, and death. Microplastics, invisible to the naked eye, infiltrate the food chain, eventually making their way onto our dinner plates, posing unknown risks to human health. The very convenience we cherish today will haunt future generations for hundreds of years, as these synthetic materials degrade at a glacial pace.

Some argue that the burden of change lies solely with large corporations or governments. While systemic shifts are undoubtedly necessary, individual choices collectively hold immense power. Every time we opt for a reusable bag, a refillable water bottle, or shun excessive packaging, we send a clear signal to producers and policymakers. We demonstrate a demand for sustainable alternatives and contribute directly to reducing the plastic footprint. This is not about perfection, but about progress – one conscious decision at a time.

We stand at a critical juncture. The narrative of plastic as a harmless convenience must give way to the urgent reality of its environmental toll. It is our shared responsibility to mitigate this crisis, beginning with a fundamental shift in our consumption habits. The future of our oceans, our wildlife, and indeed, our own well-being, hinges on the actions we choose to take today. Let us choose wisely.

25.

What is the author's main argument or claim in this essay?

26.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the evidence presented by the author. Do they rely more on facts, expert opinions, or emotional appeals? Explain your reasoning.

27.

Does the author use any logical fallacies in their argument? If so, identify and explain one. If not, explain why the argument is generally sound.

28.

Describe the author's tone throughout the passage. How does this tone contribute to the overall message and persuasive effect of the essay?

29.

Choose either a significant speech or document from the Early American period (e.g., Patrick Henry's 'Speech to the Virginia Convention,' excerpts from Thomas Paine's 'Common Sense,' or a Puritan sermon by Jonathan Edwards) OR a contemporary persuasive article/essay about a current societal issue.

Write a well-organized, multi-paragraph analytical or persuasive essay in response to your chosen text/issue. Your essay should:

  1. Clearly state the author's main purpose or your own main argument (thesis statement).
  2. Analyze how the author uses at least two distinct rhetorical strategies (e.g., ethos, pathos, logos, rhetorical questions, parallelism, allusion) to achieve their purpose and persuade their audience.
  3. Support your claims with specific textual evidence from the chosen text (if analyzing a passage) or with clear reasoning and relevant examples (if arguing a contemporary issue).
  4. Demonstrate a clear organizational structure with an introduction, body paragraphs with topic sentences, and a conclusion.
  5. Exhibit proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Copyright © 2025 llmstory.comPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service