What is the primary goal of conducting code reviews?

Describe one positive behavior that contributes to effective code reviews, focusing on how feedback should be framed. Provide an example.

Explain the benefit of asking questions rather than making demands during a code review, providing an example.

How can a reviewer provide constructive feedback when identifying a potential issue, beyond just stating the problem?

Why should reviewers avoid commenting on code style issues that are typically handled by automated tools like linters?

Explain why personal attacks or demeaning comments are detrimental to the code review process.

What is the downside of 'nitpicking' very minor issues that have little to no practical impact on the code's functionality, readability, or maintainability?