Exam Center

AI-Generated Content

This exam was created by a large language model. Please use it with caution, as inaccuracies may be present. Always verify critical information.

CloudBurst Innovations: AWS Cost Optimization Scenario

CloudBurst Innovations, a rapidly growing SaaS company, has been operating its core platform on AWS for the past three years. Their monthly AWS bill has steadily climbed to an average of $50,000, and the executive team has mandated a 20% reduction within the next six months without compromising performance or availability.

Here's a breakdown of their current AWS architecture and spending:

1. Compute (EC2 & Container Services): ~$20,000/month

EC2 Instances: They run a mix of On-Demand and Reserved Instances (RIs). Production web application servers use a fleet of 20 x m5.xlarge instances, 10 of which are covered by 1-year RIs (no upfront). The remaining 10 m5.xlarge instances run On-Demand. Their batch processing jobs utilize 15 x c5.xlarge On-Demand instances, which run intermittently, but are often left running for extended periods. Development and testing environments primarily use 5 x m5.large On-Demand instances, and it has been noted that two of these instances are typically idle outside of working hours.
Container Services: They use AWS ECS (EC2 launch type) for several microservices, running on a cluster of 8 x m5.large EC2 instances. These instances are provisioned to handle peak loads, leading to average CPU utilization of around 30% during off-peak hours.
AWS Lambda: They use Lambda for a few small, event-driven functions, contributing negligible cost (approx. $50/month).

2. Storage (S3 & EBS): ~$7,500/month

Amazon S3: Their primary S3 bucket for production data holds approximately 60TB in S3 Standard storage. Analysis shows only about 10TB of this data is accessed frequently (more than once a month), while the rest is accessed infrequently. They also have 5TB of historical log data and 15TB of older database/application backups, all residing in S3 Standard. Data in S3 is growing at a rate of 20% month-over-month. No lifecycle policies are currently configured on any buckets.
Amazon EBS: They utilize GP2 volumes for most EC2 instances. A recent audit revealed approximately 10TB of unattached EBS volumes across various regions, likely remnants from terminated instances.

3. Databases (RDS & ElastiCache): ~$10,000/month

Amazon RDS: Their core application database is a Multi-AZ PostgreSQL instance running on an r5.2xlarge instance type. CloudWatch metrics indicate an average CPU utilization of only 15% but memory utilization around 50%. They also have a few smaller development RDS instances.
Amazon ElastiCache: A Redis cluster is used for caching, consisting of 3 nodes of cache.m5.large. Its average CPU utilization hovers around 10%.

4. Networking & Data Transfer: ~$5,000/month

Data Transfer: Significant costs are incurred for data transfer out to the internet (egress - ~ $3,000/month) and cross-region data transfer for database replication and S3 data replication (~$ 1,500/month).
NAT Gateways: They have three NAT Gateways deployed across different Availability Zones in their main VPC, each contributing to hourly charges and data processing fees.
VPN/Direct Connect: A VPN connection to their on-premises network is in place, costing around $500/month.

5. Other Services (Monitoring, Security, etc.): ~$7,500/month

This category includes costs for CloudWatch, CloudTrail, Config, GuardDuty, and other operational services. These are generally considered necessary overhead but are also subject to review for optimization.

CloudBurst Innovations is seeking to optimize its AWS cloud spending. Based on the provided scenario, identify at least five specific areas of potential overspend or inefficiency within their current AWS architecture and quantify the potential monthly savings for each area where feasible. Justify your reasoning for each identified area.

CloudBurst Innovations has not significantly leveraged AWS Spot Instances. Describe how CloudBurst Innovations can effectively utilize AWS Spot Instances for their workloads. Detail the specific types of workloads best suited for Spot, the implementation strategy, and discuss the benefits and trade-offs of using Spot Instances.

CloudBurst Innovations has 60TB of production data in S3 Standard, with only 10TB frequently accessed, and a further 5TB of log data and 15TB of older backups also in S3 Standard. Data growth is 20% monthly. Propose an optimal S3 storage strategy, including specific tier recommendations and lifecycle policies, to minimize costs while maintaining necessary access patterns.

CloudBurst Innovations is incurring significant networking costs, specifically $3,000/month for egress data transfer and$ 1,500/month for cross-region data transfer, in addition to having three NAT Gateways and 10TB of unattached EBS volumes. Propose concrete strategies to reduce these networking and idle resource costs. Quantify potential savings.

CloudBurst Innovations is heavily reliant on EC2 for both their web application and batch processing. Evaluate the potential benefits and implementation considerations of adopting AWS Graviton processors and leveraging serverless compute options (Lambda, Fargate) for CloudBurst's architecture. Quantify potential savings where applicable.

Based on the provided scenario and your analysis, formulate a prioritized, phased plan (e.g., Phase 1: Quick Wins, Phase 2: Efficiency Improvements, Phase 3: Strategic Shifts) to achieve a target 20% reduction in CloudBurst Innovations' monthly AWS spending. For each phase, outline specific actions, potential implementation challenges, and strategies for monitoring progress and mitigating risks. Your plan should consider the trade-offs between cost, performance, availability, and operational complexity.

Which of the following AWS services can provide insights into cost optimization opportunities by analyzing resource utilization and configuration? A. AWS Cost Explorer B. AWS Trusted Advisor C. AWS Budgets D. AWS Cost Anomaly Detection E. All of the above.

Select one option

What is the primary benefit of using AWS Cost Explorer for a DevOps Engineer focused on FinOps?

Select one option

It automatically optimizes all resources to reduce spending.

It provides a detailed breakdown of costs and usage, allowing for custom reports and forecasts.

It alerts you when your spending exceeds a predefined threshold.

It recommends specific reserved instance purchases to save money.

It helps automate the termination of idle resources.

Which statement best describes the core principle of FinOps within a DevOps context?

Select one option

FinOps is solely about negotiating better pricing contracts with AWS.

FinOps is a set of tools used exclusively by the finance department to audit cloud bills.

A FinOps culture promotes shared responsibility for cloud costs across engineering, finance, and business teams.

FinOps aims to reduce all cloud spending to zero, regardless of business value.

FinOps replaces traditional DevOps practices with a focus on cost accounting.

10.

What is the key difference between AWS Reserved Instances (RIs) and Savings Plans in terms of flexibility and application?

Select one option

Reserved Instances offer a higher discount percentage than Savings Plans.

Savings Plans require a larger upfront payment than Reserved Instances.

Savings Plans can only be applied to EC2, while Reserved Instances apply to all AWS services.

Savings Plans offer more flexibility across instance families, regions, and services (EC2, Fargate, Lambda) compared to Reserved Instances, which are specific to instance type, region, and platform.

Reserved Instances are ideal for unpredictable workloads, while Savings Plans are for stable usage.